What do I think is web3? let me tell you!

It is because most of the concepts of NFT, digital currency, blockchain, Bitcoin, Ethereum, and Yuan universe are inseparable from the Web3 articles. The mysteriousness is mysterious. It is out of our lives and does not solve our pain points. Generally, we also taught us how to speculate in coins, how to buy NFT, and properly cut leeks, so most of them think that web3 is fooled. To be honest, I think there are many things that are hype, and I don't believe it. A picture sells millions of dollars? One air currency wants to sell my money? Yuan Universe? Maybe I have to wait for my son to grow up, right? Regarding what web3 is, each article may be introduced differently, as if everyone has not reached a consensus on what web3 is. But for ordinary people, we only care about whether web3 has solved my pain points and whether it brings me value. In this article, I will introduce the web3 form I recognize through big vernacular, which greatly solves our pain points. I would like to call the future! This article will not involve any related concepts such as leeks (I don't understand), please rest assured to eat. Web2's cage (now pain point) The web1 usually refers to the age of the portal, and the content is created by various portals. Ordinary users are only used as a viewer. The data is produced by the portal. Of course, the income is owned by them, and the value flow is correct. Summary: platform creation, platform control, platform control, and platform benefits.

The web2 that is usually said is our current Internet form: user creation, platform control, platform control, platform allocation.

Take some typical examples: We have created short videos in Douyin. Douyin has our video, controls the video distribution, and the income generated indirectly is also obtained by the Douyin platform. The social relationships, chat records, and circle of friends we have maintained on WeChat are also owned by WeChat platforms, and the income generated indirectly belongs to WeChat. We bought goods on WeChat Taobao, and a large amount of purchase records were owned by Taobao. Taobao indirectly generated income by analyzing the purchase records.

There are many problems with web2: The right of ownership and income is unreasonable: the market rules that do not conform to the market rules of "who created, who have, and who earn". For example: I have dozens of articles published by channels such as Zhihu and Public Accounts, and there are no benefits. The platform monopoly and control users: The massive content created by hundreds of millions of users is provided to the platform for free, which has spawned the generation of multiple super giants. Conversely, the giant began to control users, such as: Major content platforms are recommended to users through algorithms. Baidu search homepage is all paid advertisements. The platform is split, WeChat shields Alipay, Taobao, Douyin sharing, Taobao does not support WeChat payment. E -commerce platforms are cooked. The content released in the circle of friends is blocked by itself. Data splitting and unable to migrate: Even if we have no tolerance for the control of major platforms, we have no way to change. Our data belongs to the platform and cannot be relocated. The other is that in the current mode, it is difficult to produce the white lotus platform. Every time I write an article, I need to be in the public account, Nuggets, Zhihu, GitHub. Wait for each channel to release once. Everyone commented, likes, and attention to the article is split, belonging to various platforms, not belonging to my article. I can't stand the monopoly of WeChat, but I can't migrate the content I created by my friends, chat records, and circle of friends to other platforms. I have no way to migrate the fans, articles, comments, and attention to the Nuggets. The music I bought on QQ Music cannot be played in Netease Cloud Music Player. Privacy issues: Data from our social relationships, chat records, shopping records, search records, etc. are controlled by major platforms. They can use our privacy data at will. Data credibility: The data provided by the platform is not credible, such as: My article reading may be false. The purchase volume of goods may be false. The recommended popular videos may not be really popular. Data security: Our data is centralized by the platform. If the platform is hung, our data is gone. Personally, I have no tolerance for many points in Web2. If web3 can solve these problems, then I am a fan of web3. Freedom and development Based on a market economy, the purpose of Web3 must be user creation, user, user control, and agreement distribution. In Web3, all data of users belong to the user's individual, and users can authorize other platforms to access their own data. Imagine this scene: Social relations, chat records, real -time chat messages, etc. I personally managed by me. WeChat did not do well, so I fry his squid and not authorize him. I authorize this information to another chat tool that experiences really good. The music I bought was managed by me. QQ Music made me unhappy, so I fry him and authorize my music to another music software. I wrote the articles, as well as the data of the article, collection, and attention. I managed it. I authorized him to experience which platform experience was good. The summary is, which software makes me unhappy, I will seamlessly switch to another software, and let the software suppliers go to the inner roll.

I can fried WeChat squid at will, and I am happy to think about it. It was impossible before, but web3 did bring this opportunity. I think the implementation of web3 should be like this: The user's data is stored somewhere, and the user has fully controlling the data. Without authorization, anyone cannot access and modify the data. Software needs to be authorized by users to access the user's specific data.

For the technical solutions of the data storage part, we require the solution to trust. That is, users fully trust the data storage party, non -user authorization, and no one can access and modify the data. The centralized data storage must not meet the requirements. From the current point of view, the "blockchain" decentralization technology is very suitable for the credible data storage solution here. This is why web3 is always bound to the blockchain. In fact, if other technologies can solve trust problems, it is also OK. For software providers, the future may be lighter. For example, many software may not need a database, and the data is completely self -owned by the user. What the software needs to do is to help users manage data, such as playing music, managing articles, chatting, etc. Software providers must use high -quality experience to attract users and think about happiness.

Summarize

 Where there is oppression, there is a revolution. Web3 allows us to fully control our data and allow us to use better software. Users will vote with their feet. Why not succeed? So I still determine the direction of the web3, although this road is really difficult to be difficult It needs countless people to explore, but the future of the Internet must belong to Web3!